Methodology and about
This page explains who runs the tool, how evidence levels are assigned, how the exposure score is computed, and what the tool cannot do.
Who is behind the tool
FertiScope is run by an independent project owner. It is not a medical institution, a laboratory, or a health authority.
The tool is built as an awareness and research-hypothesis instrument: it helps situate everyday exposures and understand the actual state of knowledge. It is not a medical device and is not meant to establish a diagnosis or guide treatment.
How evidence levels are assigned
Each factor carries a single status, chosen from five levels:
- Established: effect recognised by health authorities or by consistent systematic reviews.
- Probable: several converging human studies, without formal consensus yet.
- Emerging: preliminary signal (animal, in vitro, or small cohorts) still to be confirmed.
- Not studied: no usable published data on fertility for this factor.
- Unconfirmed claim: a publicly circulating statement that available data do not support.
What can change a status
A status is not changed on the basis of a testimony, a press article, or one isolated paper. To be admissible, a study must meet these criteria:
- Published in a peer-reviewed journal, with a consultable method.
- Sufficient sample size and a described population (subject count and inclusion criteria are explicit).
- Reproducibility: the result is found again by an independent team or included in a systematic review.
- Exposure relevance: dose, duration, and route comparable to real-world use.
How the score is computed
The score is not a medical risk. It is an indicator of reported exposure intensity, built in four steps:
- For each answer: exposure frequency multiplied by exposure duration.
- Aggregation by questionnaire category (cosmetics, food, water, medicines, environment, lifestyle, other).
- Grouping by shared biological mechanism (endocrine disruption, oxidative stress, thermal effect, and so on), so the same lead is not counted ten times.
- Weighting by evidence level: an established factor weighs more than an emerging one, and an unconfirmed claim carries no weight.
Explicit limitations
This is not a diagnostic tool: it does not measure fertility and gives no probability of conception.
Answers are not stored: they stay in the browser for the session and then disappear.
Including a factor is not an accusation of causality. A factor may appear in the library precisely because it is debated, poorly studied, or unconfirmed.
The score depends on what the person reports: it replaces neither a medical examination nor an actual exposure measurement.
General sources used
Content relies on public sources and on peer-reviewed literature, cited factor by factor:
- ANSES (French agency for food, environmental and occupational health safety).
- INSERM (French national institute of health and medical research).
- WHO (World Health Organization).
- Pharmacovigilance databases: VigiBase (WHO), EudraVigilance (EMA), ANSM, FAERS (FDA).
- Peer-reviewed scientific literature, referenced in the source field of each factor sheet.
Including a factor does not mean it causes infertility: it is simply worth monitoring, depending on its level of evidence.
Content last updated: September 14, 2026